the difference in grammatical matters between modern grammarians

نویسندگان

ریاض السواد

عراق سمیه کاظمی نجف آبادی

دانشگاه اصفهان

چکیده

proceeded difference in opinion of grammarians led to the capacity of thought in grammar of arabic language, and cause to the conflict in thought of the grammarians. this research aims to study the difference between grammarians in modern grammatical matters, which is similar to that difference that took place between grammarians in basra and kufa in matters of arabic grammar. the present research, therefore, had take the method of descriptive and analyzing to study the opinion of the modern grammarians on several sections grammatical study’s methodology, parts of speech, definition of sentences, and the means of meaning discrimination in nouns and verbs. the difference in opinion of grammarians is for finding the way which corrects grammar approach that led to the complexity and difficulty. so, some modern grammarians adopt the grammar of kufa, because he saw that is easy, others taking what is easier to the process of education.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

the tragedy of modern man in arthur millers world

what miller wants is a theatre of heightened consciousness. he speaks of two passions in a man, the passion to "feel" and the passion "know". he belives that we can have more of the latter. he says: drama is akin to the other inventions of man in that it ought to help us know more and not merely to spend our feelings. the writing of the crucible shows us that he is trying to give more heightene...

15 صفحه اول

Tendinopathy: Why the Difference Between Tendinitis and Tendinosis Matters

E d U c a t i o N Think tendinitis and you think pain and burning in the affected area, decreased strength and flexibility, and pain caused by everyday activities. As it turns out, tendinosis is far more often responsible for these symptoms than tendinitis (1,2,3). It is important for health care practitioners to distinguish between these disorders in order to apply the most appropriate treatme...

متن کامل

Approximation and Idealization: Why the Difference Matters

It is proposed that we use the term “approximation” for inexact description of a target system and “idealization” for another system whose properties also provide an inexact description of the target system. Since systems generated by a limiting process can often have quite unexpected, even inconsistent properties, familiar limit processes used in statistical physics can fail to provide idealiz...

متن کامل

the relationship between learners critical thinking ability and their performance in the reading sections of the tofel and ielts test

the study reflected in this thesis aims at finding out relationships between critical thinking (ct), and the reading sections of tofel and ielts tests. the study tries to find any relationships between the ct ability of students and their performance on reading tests of tofel and academic ielts. however, no research has ever been conducted to investigate the relationship between ct and the read...

15 صفحه اول

A Toolchain for Grammarians

We present a chain of tools used by grammarians and computer scientists to develop grammatical and lexical resources from linguistic knowledge, for various natural languages. The developed resources are intended to be used in Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems.

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
بحوث فی اللغه العربیه

جلد ۶، شماره ۱۱، صفحات ۷۱-۹۲

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023